fbpx
4 Jul 2023 ///

Twitter Initiates A Limit On How Many Tweets Users Can View Per Day

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has been at the centre of controversy due to his actions, statements, and management style (or lack thereof). His provocative tweets have resulted in criticism and legal repercussions, notably his tweet in 2018 about taking Tesla private at $420 per share, which led to SEC charges and a subsequent settlement. His leadership approach, characterised by bold statements, public criticism of analysts and journalists, and bloated production targets, has generated debates and divided opinions; least not because of his refusal to allow workers to unionise. Tesla is currently the only auto-manufacturing company in the United States not represented by a union, rendering its employees unsafe regarding benefits, wage-security and legal protection. Musk’s views and comments on the COVID-19 pandemic have caused further controversy and by downplaying the severity of the virus and promoting unproven treatments, he has been accused of spreading misinformation and undermining public health efforts. So, when Musk decided he wanted to purchase Twitter (his personal favourite app) – his reasons were to ‘help humanity’ and ‘save free speech’ seemed a little off.
@sainthoax shares the news on Instagram.
The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk is a whole debacle on its own; you can read about it in chronological detail here. Basically, he and the Twitter execs had a drawn-out battle, resulting in Elon purchasing the app for $44 billion.  As is common in the acquisition playbook, Musk utilised his wealth and assets, including stocks, to acquire Twitter. The fall-out of this decision for Musk, to provide some context as to why Twitter is where it is today, is best described here,The initially proposed $13 billion in money borrowed by Twitter is equivalent to seven times the company’s 2022 projected operating cash flow; some banks found that multiple too risky and opted to participate only in the $12.5 billion margin loan to Musk. The debt is estimated to cost Twitter approximately $1 billion in annual interest and fees. Two days after announcing his bid, Musk registered three holding companies under the name “X Holdings” in preparation for his takeover. Tesla shares fell 12 percent on the day after the acquisition was announced, amid smaller declines in the broader markets. Musk incurred a $21 billion paper loss that day. Within three days after Twitter agreed to be acquired, Musk had sold $8.5 billion of his Tesla shares.” Basically, Elon Musk bought Twitter on an impulsive whim, cornering himself with a profit-draining app. 

In a bizarre attempt to create some kind of income stream for the free-to-use app, Musk instituted a subscription for the platform; taking away ‘blue tick verifications’ so that anyone purchases for a tick at $8 a pop. Musk denounced the existing hierarchical structure of Twitter, describing it as an elitist system dividing users into “lords” and “peasants.” Instead, he proposed a change, stating that anyone could obtain a verification checkmark by subscribing to Twitter Blue, a monthly paid subscription. This subscription would offer additional features such as tweet editing, an expanded character limit, and prioritised visibility in search results and reply rankings. Musk’s aim was to democratise access to enhanced Twitter functionalities, making them available to a broader range of users rather than solely benefiting the select few. This is no Robin Hood act, though and it’s seen Twitter lose credibility, loyal followers and generally marked Elon Musk as someone with little to no vision on how to run a social media app. Let’s not forget that he also fired about 80% of the company, too.

Image by WIREIMAGE, Theo Wargo.
In the latest chapter of this strange story, Musk’s Twitter has now set a temporary restriction on the number of tweets users can view per day. For verified users, this means 6,000 tweets per day – and for the unverified (who refused to pay the $8 to get a blue tick) are allowed a meagre 600 tweets per day. So much for freedom of speech and democratic access! The reason stated by Musk is his concern with ‘data scraping’ and ‘system manipulation’ although it’s unclear what precisely he means by this. Data scraping, also known as web scraping, is the process of automatically extracting data from websites. It involves using software or scripts to crawl web pages, retrieve specific information, and store it for use. This is the primary way in which companies are building AI machine-learning models such as ChatGPT. As reported by News24, Musk had earlier expressed displeasure with artificial intelligence firms like OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, for using Twitter’s data to train their large language models.” Concern for AI’s rapid acceleration is a fair one, but this divisive scheme appears to be another impulsive choice for Elon Musk. Why would Twitter users, some of the most loyal communities in the social media landscape, continue to have their user-experience dictated and now controlled by a man purporting ‘freedom of speech’ like its some dog-whistle, rather than a substantiated cause? 

It seems the controversy was too much even for Elon, who subtweeted himself to state that soon verified users would increase from 6,000 to 8,000 and then to 10,000, and unverified users would climb to 800 and 1,000 respectively, and new unverified accounts would reach 300 to 400 and finally, a generous 500 for their brand-spanking-new Twitter experience. Another lesson in the futility of the ruling class, we suppose.

Featured image courtesy of  NewsWire.
Written by: Holly Beaton
For more news, visit the Connect Everything Collective homepage www.ceconline.co.za

You May Also Like