This self-directed education laid the foundation for a filmmaker drawn instinctively to character and story — as you’ll note with Zandi’s work, she is less concerned with structure, and more attuned to the emotional and psychological materia of characters, as they archetypically express human nature; “I’m always drawn to more kind of character-driven stories, me personally, than I am really about like plot-driven stories. Characters come to me first before a series of events. The events, for me, come from the people and the choices they make and why.”
When Zandi graduated, the world was in an economic crisis and film jobs were scarce. Rather than wait for the perfect opportunity, she found her way into the industry sideways; through wardrobe departments, casting rooms, and photography gigs. These roles, though peripheral on paper, became her critical learning grounds. “There were a lot of diversions and taking other paths because, you know, the reality was I graduated my undergrad pretty much around the start of that first recession. So I came out into the world and there was no work. I’d also done some photography and so I worked as a freelance photographer doing all kinds of little jobs,wherever I could to earn a little bit of money and then I got a gig as a wardrobe assistant. That’s actually how I got my set experience.”
Set is a sobering experience for anyone with romantic notions of it. As Zandi notes, “Where it became very clear that this idea that I had in my head about a director being this individual auteur who makes the work come to life through force of their own individual will, and so all my understanding around individual creativity was completely blown apart. I became really aware of the collaborative process, and importantly, I became very aware of the fact that film making wasn’t just about me, really.”
For Zandi, collaboration is a revelatory site, intrinsic to creating a film. She believes that everyone on set — from stylists to grips — is a filmmaker in their own right. Breaking the term down to its most elemental form is essential. “Everyone’s just trying to create a space where they can give the best they possibly can,” she explains, “and that the best that they possibly can, and also that everybody in a sense has to be a filmmaker. Even as a stylist, you have to think like a filmmaker. You’re not filmmaking by yourself — you’ve got a bunch of filmmakers on set who are addressing different aspects of cinema.”
Zandi’s critique of the cultural obsession with lone creative geniuses — and how it distorts the reality of how work actually gets made — feels like such a necessary correction. Personally, I’ve long desired this kind of articulation, and it is one of the biggest crises facing the creative industry today (aside from economic pressures, and the commercialisation of just about everything). We see it everywhere, especially in fashion, where the myth of the singular visionary creative director persists, and so many people seem to have forgotten, or perhaps never truly understood, that behind every name is an entire team, a house, a constellation of collaborators. The work is no longer the central, guiding force; rather, it’s the rise of the single individual who becomes the vessel for collective labour, elevated to near-mythic status.
It’s within this acute understanding that Zandi’s directing practice, then, is less about imposing a singular vision and more about holding a space for collective brilliance to emerge. It is also why, years later and into her career, another profound shift entered Zandi’s life: motherhood. Like many women in creative industries, she initially felt the tug between two identities that seemed mutually exclusive. “I think that I became, and at first it felt like this tug of war where it was like you’re either a director or a mom and that these things are mutually exclusive and that they’re fighting one another and that you have to pick one, one over the other. And after a while for me I was just like purely on the basis that I can’t cope with that reality, I’ve got to think of it differently because it’s too, I felt like it was kind of pulling me apart in a way.”
Lo and behold, Zandi’s awareness offered me a seismic shift in my own thinking. As she explains, she chose to reimagine motherhood as a creative act in itself. “I really began to kind of really see, you know, being a mom as a very creative area. Designing or creating someone’s childhood is actually a very dynamic and creative process. And that it’s not just about feeding and clothing, but, like I say, it’s a childhood and you’ve got to imagine what the ideal childhood is that you can provide for your child.”
Rather than hide her motherhood from professional spaces, Zandi folded it into her practice — bringing her baby to set when necessary, allowing her life to be visible. “There’s always this idea that being a mom won’t affect you — that you’ll still be the old you. But that’s just not true. It affects everything. I’m not the old me. I can still do the things I did before, but this is real, it’s happening. If my baby has to be in the background during a meeting, then that’s just what it is.”
Motherhood also altered the way Zandi works — forcing her to make faster, sharper creative decisions and embrace efficiency without losing sensitivity. “Post-motherhood, I just don’t have the time to be that hectic about stuff. I kind of have to arrive at decisions quite quicker and I’ve got a very economic way of communicating those quite efficiently and quite quickly. It’s so strange because that seemed to work better than what I was doing before! But that only came as a result of the reality of just not having as much time and mental space.”
Recent Comments